2015 College Football Ratings Summary |
College |
Conference |
W |
L |
P-Rank |
P-Rating |
R-Rank |
R-Rating |
CFP Rank |
AP Rank |
New Mexico State | Sun Belt | 0 | 7 | 127 | -30.3 | 128 | -23.8 | | |
Central Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 7 | 107 | -14.8 | 127 | -20.0 | | |
Eastern Michigan | Mid-American | 1 | 7 | 122 | -23.5 | 126 | -19.4 | | |
Miami (Ohio) | Mid-American | 0 | 7 | 126 | -25.3 | 125 | -17.3 | | |
Wyoming | Mountain West | 1 | 6 | 110 | -16.0 | 124 | -16.4 | | |
North Texas | Conference USA | 0 | 6 | 123 | -23.7 | 123 | -16.2 | | |
Purdue | Big Ten | 0 | 6 | 92 | -8.2 | 121 | -15.7 | | |
Florida Atlantic | Conference USA | 1 | 6 | 114 | -18.8 | 122 | -15.7 | | |
Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 0 | 6 | 119 | -20.7 | 120 | -15.1 | | |
Troy | Sun Belt | 1 | 5 | 105 | -13.5 | 119 | -14.9 | | |
North Carolina-Charlotte | Conference USA | 1 | 5 | 128 | -32.1 | 118 | -14.8 | | |
Ball State | Mid-American | 1 | 6 | 101 | -12.5 | 117 | -13.9 | | |
Army | Independent | 1 | 5 | 100 | -12.5 | 116 | -13.6 | | |
Texas-San Antonio | Conference USA | 1 | 6 | 106 | -14.8 | 115 | -13.3 | | |
Kansas | Big 12 | 0 | 6 | 111 | -16.5 | 114 | -13.2 | | |
Texas-El Paso | Conference USA | 2 | 4 | 125 | -25.1 | 113 | -12.6 | | |
Fresno State | Mountain West | 1 | 6 | 118 | -20.6 | 112 | -12.2 | | |
Nevada-Las Vegas | Mountain West | 1 | 5 | 103 | -12.9 | 111 | -12.0 | | |
Hawaii | Mountain West | 1 | 6 | 109 | -15.7 | 110 | -11.8 | | |
Massachusetts | Mid-American | 1 | 6 | 108 | -15.3 | 109 | -11.3 | | |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Sun Belt | 1 | 4 | 99 | -12.4 | 108 | -11.2 | | |
Boston College | ACC | 1 | 5 | 61 | 3.2 | 106 | -10.0 | | |
Texas State | Sun Belt | 1 | 4 | 112 | -17.0 | 107 | -10.0 | | |
New Mexico | Mountain West | 3 | 4 | 113 | -17.3 | 105 | -9.5 | | |
Southern Methodist | American Athletic | 1 | 5 | 102 | -12.5 | 102 | -9.3 | | |
Georgia State | Sun Belt | 2 | 3 | 121 | -22.7 | 103 | -9.3 | | |
Tulane | American Athletic | 1 | 5 | 115 | -19.0 | 104 | -9.3 | | |
Old Dominion | Conference USA | 2 | 4 | 124 | -24.7 | 101 | -9.2 | | |
Oregon State | Pac 12 | 1 | 5 | 88 | -7.1 | 100 | -9.1 | | |
Connecticut | American Athletic | 2 | 5 | 87 | -7.0 | 99 | -9.0 | | |
Nevada | Mountain West | 3 | 4 | 95 | -10.3 | 98 | -8.8 | | |
Idaho | Sun Belt | 2 | 4 | 117 | -20.5 | 97 | -8.4 | | |
Middle Tennessee State | Conference USA | 2 | 5 | 83 | -4.7 | 96 | -8.3 | | |
Florida International | Conference USA | 3 | 4 | 91 | -7.5 | 95 | -8.2 | | |
Wake Forest | ACC | 2 | 5 | 86 | -5.9 | 94 | -8.0 | | |
Colorado State | Mountain West | 2 | 4 | 90 | -7.5 | 93 | -7.5 | | |
South Alabama | Sun Belt | 2 | 4 | 116 | -19.6 | 91 | -7.3 | | |
Kent State | Mid-American | 2 | 5 | 120 | -20.7 | 92 | -7.3 | | |
Buffalo | Mid-American | 2 | 4 | 94 | -9.8 | 90 | -7.2 | | |
San Jose State | Mountain West | 3 | 4 | 98 | -11.9 | 89 | -6.9 | | |
Virginia | ACC | 1 | 5 | 70 | 0.1 | 88 | -6.2 | | |
Maryland | Big Ten | 1 | 5 | 77 | -2.7 | 87 | -6.0 | | |
Colorado | Pac 12 | 3 | 4 | 84 | -4.8 | 86 | -5.9 | | |
Iowa State | Big 12 | 1 | 5 | 76 | -2.4 | 85 | -5.1 | | |
Akron | Mid-American | 2 | 4 | 97 | -11.2 | 84 | -5.0 | | |
Northern Illinois | Mid-American | 4 | 3 | 68 | 0.5 | 81 | -4.5 | | |
Syracuse | ACC | 2 | 4 | 73 | -1.5 | 82 | -4.5 | | |
Virginia Tech | ACC | 2 | 5 | 44 | 7.1 | 83 | -4.5 | | |
Vanderbilt | SEC | 2 | 4 | 65 | 1.6 | 80 | -3.7 | | |
Air Force | Mountain West | 3 | 3 | 85 | -5.8 | 79 | -2.9 | | |
Nebraska | Big Ten | 3 | 5 | 42 | 7.8 | 77 | -2.1 | | |
Tulsa | American Athletic | 3 | 4 | 89 | -7.4 | 78 | -2.1 | | |
Arkansas State | Sun Belt | 3 | 3 | 93 | -9.6 | 73 | -1.7 | | |
Rice | Conference USA | 3 | 3 | 104 | -13.3 | 74 | -1.7 | | |
Central Michigan | Mid-American | 3 | 4 | 71 | -0.3 | 75 | -1.7 | | |
Southern Mississippi | Conference USA | 4 | 3 | 81 | -4.1 | 76 | -1.7 | | |
South Carolina | SEC | 3 | 4 | 63 | 3.0 | 72 | -1.6 | | |
Georgia Tech | ACC | 2 | 5 | 30 | 11.1 | 71 | -1.3 | | |
Missouri | SEC | 3 | 4 | 52 | 4.5 | 70 | -1.2 | | |
Louisville | ACC | 2 | 4 | 38 | 8.5 | 69 | -1.1 | | |
Kansas State | Big 12 | 2 | 4 | 55 | 3.8 | 68 | -0.8 | | |
South Florida | American Athletic | 3 | 3 | 69 | 0.4 | 67 | -0.7 | | |
Ohio U. | Mid-American | 4 | 3 | 96 | -11.0 | 66 | -0.2 | | |
Louisiana Tech | Conference USA | 4 | 3 | 60 | 3.2 | 65 | -0.1 | | |
North Carolina State | ACC | 4 | 2 | 41 | 8.2 | 64 | 0.0 | | |
San Diego State | Mountain West | 4 | 3 | 75 | -2.4 | 63 | 0.1 | | |
Washington | Pac 12 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 10.7 | 62 | 0.4 | | |
Illinois | Big Ten | 3 | 3 | 66 | 1.4 | 61 | 0.5 | | |
Rutgers | Big Ten | 2 | 4 | 82 | -4.5 | 60 | 0.6 | | |
Utah State | Mountain West | 3 | 3 | 62 | 3.1 | 59 | 0.7 | | |
Miami (Fla.) | ACC | 3 | 3 | 58 | 3.4 | 58 | 0.8 | | |
Tennessee | SEC | 2 | 4 | 13 | 17.3 | 57 | 0.9 | | |
Kentucky | SEC | 3 | 3 | 59 | 3.4 | 54 | 1.1 | | |
Minnesota | Big Ten | 4 | 3 | 78 | -3.2 | 55 | 1.1 | | |
Arkansas | SEC | 3 | 4 | 34 | 9.8 | 56 | 1.1 | | |
Indiana | Big Ten | 3 | 4 | 72 | -1.2 | 53 | 1.3 | | |
East Carolina | American Athletic | 3 | 4 | 64 | 1.7 | 52 | 1.8 | | |
Arizona | Pac 12 | 4 | 3 | 56 | 3.7 | 51 | 2.0 | | |
West Virginia | Big 12 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 15.8 | 49 | 2.5 | | |
Cincinnati | American Athletic | 3 | 3 | 67 | 1.1 | 50 | 2.5 | | |
Arizona State | Pac 12 | 3 | 3 | 39 | 8.3 | 48 | 3.1 | | |
Auburn | SEC | 3 | 3 | 35 | 9.1 | 47 | 3.3 | | |
Western Michigan | Mid-American | 3 | 3 | 79 | -3.2 | 46 | 3.5 | | |
Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 4 | 2 | 80 | -3.5 | 45 | 3.6 | | |
Georgia | SEC | 4 | 2 | 20 | 14.8 | 44 | 4.0 | | |
Oregon | Pac 12 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 8.3 | 43 | 4.2 | | |
Boise State | Mountain West | 5 | 2 | 26 | 12.1 | 42 | 4.5 | | |
Texas Tech | Big 12 | 4 | 3 | 37 | 8.8 | 41 | 4.7 | | |
North Carolina | ACC | 4 | 1 | 23 | 13.8 | 38 | 5.2 | | |
Marshall | Conference USA | 6 | 1 | 74 | -2.3 | 39 | 5.2 | | |
Texas | Big 12 | 3 | 4 | 50 | 5.5 | 40 | 5.2 | | |
USC | Pac 12 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 21.0 | 37 | 5.3 | | |
Bowling Green State | Mid-American | 6 | 2 | 45 | 6.4 | 36 | 5.6 | | |
Western Kentucky | Conference USA | 6 | 2 | 48 | 6.2 | 35 | 7.6 | | |
Wisconsin | Big Ten | 6 | 2 | 29 | 11.4 | 34 | 7.7 | | |
Duke | ACC | 5 | 1 | 33 | 10.2 | 33 | 7.8 | | 22 |
Florida State | ACC | 6 | 1 | 19 | 15.6 | 32 | 7.9 | | 17 |
Navy | American Athletic | 4 | 1 | 54 | 3.8 | 31 | 8.5 | | |
Brigham Young | Independent | 5 | 2 | 43 | 7.6 | 30 | 8.9 | | |
UCLA | Pac 12 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 14.1 | 29 | 9.0 | | 24 |
Texas A&M | SEC | 5 | 2 | 24 | 13.7 | 28 | 9.2 | | |
Penn State | Big Ten | 6 | 2 | 57 | 3.5 | 26 | 9.7 | | |
Mississippi State | SEC | 5 | 2 | 15 | 16.4 | 27 | 9.7 | | 25 |
Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 5 | 1 | 49 | 6.1 | 25 | 9.9 | | |
Michigan | Big Ten | 5 | 2 | 12 | 17.4 | 24 | 10.6 | | 15 |
Oklahoma | Big 12 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 24.5 | 23 | 11.4 | | 14 |
California | Pac 12 | 4 | 2 | 31 | 11.1 | 22 | 11.7 | | |
Northwestern | Big Ten | 5 | 2 | 53 | 4.0 | 21 | 12.3 | | |
Washington State | Pac 12 | 5 | 1 | 47 | 6.2 | 20 | 12.9 | | |
Mississippi | SEC | 5 | 2 | 17 | 16.1 | 19 | 13.0 | | 19 |
Pittsburgh | ACC | 5 | 1 | 36 | 9.0 | 18 | 13.2 | | 23 |
Stanford | Pac 12 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 19.2 | 17 | 13.6 | | 8 |
Toledo | Mid-American | 7 | 0 | 46 | 6.3 | 15 | 13.7 | | 20 |
Houston | American Athletic | 6 | 0 | 25 | 13.5 | 16 | 13.7 | | 18 |
Notre Dame | Independent | 6 | 1 | 7 | 19.7 | 14 | 14.2 | | 9 |
Utah | Pac 12 | 6 | 1 | 16 | 16.2 | 13 | 14.3 | | 13 |
Alabama | SEC | 7 | 1 | 4 | 23.2 | 11 | 14.9 | | 7 |
Baylor | Big 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 27.9 | 12 | 14.9 | | 2 |
Florida | SEC | 6 | 1 | 11 | 17.4 | 10 | 15.8 | | 11 |
Temple | American Athletic | 7 | 0 | 51 | 5.0 | 8 | 17.2 | | 21 |
Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 16.7 | 9 | 17.2 | | 12 |
Texas Christian | Big 12 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 18.3 | 7 | 18.3 | | 5 |
Ohio State | Big Ten | 8 | 0 | 5 | 21.1 | 6 | 18.5 | | 1 |
Clemson | ACC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 25.7 | 5 | 19.1 | | 3 |
Memphis | American Athletic | 6 | 0 | 28 | 11.4 | 4 | 19.4 | | 16 |
Michigan State | Big Ten | 8 | 0 | 27 | 11.9 | 3 | 20.3 | | 6 |
LSU | SEC | 7 | 0 | 10 | 18.3 | 2 | 20.8 | | 4 |
Iowa | Big Ten | 6 | 0 | 22 | 14.0 | 1 | 21.4 | | 10 |
College sports ratings use a somewhat less sophisticated version of the NFL model that does not use individual play data. Final scores and game location are the only data used. Unlike BCS computer ratings, point difference is factored rather than simply the outcome of the game. Instead of adjusting ratings for repeatability, both teams in each game are given equal responsibility for the result. Each team is assigned a normal probability distribution for quality such that the most likely scenario considering all games at once is optimized. In doing so, home field advantage is factored where applicable and strength of schedule is automatically accounted for. After 1 game, a team's rating will simply be their net points divided by 2. Past the first game, relative strength of opponents and how far a result is from the expected result begin to factor in. Like the NFL ratings, the first few weeks' ratings are unreliable but quickly become increasingly accurate thereafter. Subtracting one team's rating from another's will give an expected point spread should they play at a neutral site.