2015 College Football Ratings Summary |
College |
Conference |
W |
L |
P-Rank |
P-Rating |
R-Rank |
R-Rating |
CFP Rank |
AP Rank |
North Carolina-Charlotte | Conference USA | 1 | 5 | 128 | -32.1 | 118 | -14.8 | | |
New Mexico State | Sun Belt | 0 | 7 | 127 | -30.3 | 128 | -23.8 | | |
Miami (Ohio) | Mid-American | 0 | 7 | 126 | -25.3 | 125 | -17.3 | | |
Texas-El Paso | Conference USA | 2 | 4 | 125 | -25.1 | 113 | -12.6 | | |
Old Dominion | Conference USA | 2 | 4 | 124 | -24.7 | 101 | -9.2 | | |
North Texas | Conference USA | 0 | 6 | 123 | -23.7 | 123 | -16.2 | | |
Eastern Michigan | Mid-American | 1 | 7 | 122 | -23.5 | 126 | -19.4 | | |
Georgia State | Sun Belt | 2 | 3 | 121 | -22.7 | 103 | -9.3 | | |
Kent State | Mid-American | 2 | 5 | 120 | -20.7 | 92 | -7.3 | | |
Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 0 | 6 | 119 | -20.7 | 120 | -15.1 | | |
Fresno State | Mountain West | 1 | 6 | 118 | -20.6 | 112 | -12.2 | | |
Idaho | Sun Belt | 2 | 4 | 117 | -20.5 | 97 | -8.4 | | |
South Alabama | Sun Belt | 2 | 4 | 116 | -19.6 | 91 | -7.3 | | |
Tulane | American Athletic | 1 | 5 | 115 | -19.0 | 104 | -9.3 | | |
Florida Atlantic | Conference USA | 1 | 6 | 114 | -18.8 | 122 | -15.7 | | |
New Mexico | Mountain West | 3 | 4 | 113 | -17.3 | 105 | -9.5 | | |
Texas State | Sun Belt | 1 | 4 | 112 | -17.0 | 107 | -10.0 | | |
Kansas | Big 12 | 0 | 6 | 111 | -16.5 | 114 | -13.2 | | |
Wyoming | Mountain West | 1 | 6 | 110 | -16.0 | 124 | -16.4 | | |
Hawaii | Mountain West | 1 | 6 | 109 | -15.7 | 110 | -11.8 | | |
Massachusetts | Mid-American | 1 | 6 | 108 | -15.3 | 109 | -11.3 | | |
Texas-San Antonio | Conference USA | 1 | 6 | 106 | -14.8 | 115 | -13.3 | | |
Central Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 7 | 107 | -14.8 | 127 | -20.0 | | |
Troy | Sun Belt | 1 | 5 | 105 | -13.5 | 119 | -14.9 | | |
Rice | Conference USA | 3 | 3 | 104 | -13.3 | 74 | -1.7 | | |
Nevada-Las Vegas | Mountain West | 1 | 5 | 103 | -12.9 | 111 | -12.0 | | |
Southern Methodist | American Athletic | 1 | 5 | 102 | -12.5 | 102 | -9.3 | | |
Army | Independent | 1 | 5 | 100 | -12.5 | 116 | -13.6 | | |
Ball State | Mid-American | 1 | 6 | 101 | -12.5 | 117 | -13.9 | | |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Sun Belt | 1 | 4 | 99 | -12.4 | 108 | -11.2 | | |
San Jose State | Mountain West | 3 | 4 | 98 | -11.9 | 89 | -6.9 | | |
Akron | Mid-American | 2 | 4 | 97 | -11.2 | 84 | -5.0 | | |
Ohio U. | Mid-American | 4 | 3 | 96 | -11.0 | 66 | -0.2 | | |
Nevada | Mountain West | 3 | 4 | 95 | -10.3 | 98 | -8.8 | | |
Buffalo | Mid-American | 2 | 4 | 94 | -9.8 | 90 | -7.2 | | |
Arkansas State | Sun Belt | 3 | 3 | 93 | -9.6 | 73 | -1.7 | | |
Purdue | Big Ten | 0 | 6 | 92 | -8.2 | 121 | -15.7 | | |
Colorado State | Mountain West | 2 | 4 | 90 | -7.5 | 93 | -7.5 | | |
Florida International | Conference USA | 3 | 4 | 91 | -7.5 | 95 | -8.2 | | |
Tulsa | American Athletic | 3 | 4 | 89 | -7.4 | 78 | -2.1 | | |
Oregon State | Pac 12 | 1 | 5 | 88 | -7.1 | 100 | -9.1 | | |
Connecticut | American Athletic | 2 | 5 | 87 | -7.0 | 99 | -9.0 | | |
Wake Forest | ACC | 2 | 5 | 86 | -5.9 | 94 | -8.0 | | |
Air Force | Mountain West | 3 | 3 | 85 | -5.8 | 79 | -2.9 | | |
Colorado | Pac 12 | 3 | 4 | 84 | -4.8 | 86 | -5.9 | | |
Middle Tennessee State | Conference USA | 2 | 5 | 83 | -4.7 | 96 | -8.3 | | |
Rutgers | Big Ten | 2 | 4 | 82 | -4.5 | 60 | 0.6 | | |
Southern Mississippi | Conference USA | 4 | 3 | 81 | -4.1 | 76 | -1.7 | | |
Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 4 | 2 | 80 | -3.5 | 45 | 3.6 | | |
Western Michigan | Mid-American | 3 | 3 | 79 | -3.2 | 46 | 3.5 | | |
Minnesota | Big Ten | 4 | 3 | 78 | -3.2 | 55 | 1.1 | | |
Maryland | Big Ten | 1 | 5 | 77 | -2.7 | 87 | -6.0 | | |
San Diego State | Mountain West | 4 | 3 | 75 | -2.4 | 63 | 0.1 | | |
Iowa State | Big 12 | 1 | 5 | 76 | -2.4 | 85 | -5.1 | | |
Marshall | Conference USA | 6 | 1 | 74 | -2.3 | 39 | 5.2 | | |
Syracuse | ACC | 2 | 4 | 73 | -1.5 | 82 | -4.5 | | |
Indiana | Big Ten | 3 | 4 | 72 | -1.2 | 53 | 1.3 | | |
Central Michigan | Mid-American | 3 | 4 | 71 | -0.3 | 75 | -1.7 | | |
Virginia | ACC | 1 | 5 | 70 | 0.1 | 88 | -6.2 | | |
South Florida | American Athletic | 3 | 3 | 69 | 0.4 | 67 | -0.7 | | |
Northern Illinois | Mid-American | 4 | 3 | 68 | 0.5 | 81 | -4.5 | | |
Cincinnati | American Athletic | 3 | 3 | 67 | 1.1 | 50 | 2.5 | | |
Illinois | Big Ten | 3 | 3 | 66 | 1.4 | 61 | 0.5 | | |
Vanderbilt | SEC | 2 | 4 | 65 | 1.6 | 80 | -3.7 | | |
East Carolina | American Athletic | 3 | 4 | 64 | 1.7 | 52 | 1.8 | | |
South Carolina | SEC | 3 | 4 | 63 | 3.0 | 72 | -1.6 | | |
Utah State | Mountain West | 3 | 3 | 62 | 3.1 | 59 | 0.7 | | |
Louisiana Tech | Conference USA | 4 | 3 | 60 | 3.2 | 65 | -0.1 | | |
Boston College | ACC | 1 | 5 | 61 | 3.2 | 106 | -10.0 | | |
Kentucky | SEC | 3 | 3 | 59 | 3.4 | 54 | 1.1 | | |
Miami (Fla.) | ACC | 3 | 3 | 58 | 3.4 | 58 | 0.8 | | |
Penn State | Big Ten | 6 | 2 | 57 | 3.5 | 26 | 9.7 | | |
Arizona | Pac 12 | 4 | 3 | 56 | 3.7 | 51 | 2.0 | | |
Navy | American Athletic | 4 | 1 | 54 | 3.8 | 31 | 8.5 | | |
Kansas State | Big 12 | 2 | 4 | 55 | 3.8 | 68 | -0.8 | | |
Northwestern | Big Ten | 5 | 2 | 53 | 4.0 | 21 | 12.3 | | |
Missouri | SEC | 3 | 4 | 52 | 4.5 | 70 | -1.2 | | |
Temple | American Athletic | 7 | 0 | 51 | 5.0 | 8 | 17.2 | | 21 |
Texas | Big 12 | 3 | 4 | 50 | 5.5 | 40 | 5.2 | | |
Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 5 | 1 | 49 | 6.1 | 25 | 9.9 | | |
Washington State | Pac 12 | 5 | 1 | 47 | 6.2 | 20 | 12.9 | | |
Western Kentucky | Conference USA | 6 | 2 | 48 | 6.2 | 35 | 7.6 | | |
Toledo | Mid-American | 7 | 0 | 46 | 6.3 | 15 | 13.7 | | 20 |
Bowling Green State | Mid-American | 6 | 2 | 45 | 6.4 | 36 | 5.6 | | |
Virginia Tech | ACC | 2 | 5 | 44 | 7.1 | 83 | -4.5 | | |
Brigham Young | Independent | 5 | 2 | 43 | 7.6 | 30 | 8.9 | | |
Nebraska | Big Ten | 3 | 5 | 42 | 7.8 | 77 | -2.1 | | |
North Carolina State | ACC | 4 | 2 | 41 | 8.2 | 64 | 0.0 | | |
Oregon | Pac 12 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 8.3 | 43 | 4.2 | | |
Arizona State | Pac 12 | 3 | 3 | 39 | 8.3 | 48 | 3.1 | | |
Louisville | ACC | 2 | 4 | 38 | 8.5 | 69 | -1.1 | | |
Texas Tech | Big 12 | 4 | 3 | 37 | 8.8 | 41 | 4.7 | | |
Pittsburgh | ACC | 5 | 1 | 36 | 9.0 | 18 | 13.2 | | 23 |
Auburn | SEC | 3 | 3 | 35 | 9.1 | 47 | 3.3 | | |
Arkansas | SEC | 3 | 4 | 34 | 9.8 | 56 | 1.1 | | |
Duke | ACC | 5 | 1 | 33 | 10.2 | 33 | 7.8 | | 22 |
Washington | Pac 12 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 10.7 | 62 | 0.4 | | |
California | Pac 12 | 4 | 2 | 31 | 11.1 | 22 | 11.7 | | |
Georgia Tech | ACC | 2 | 5 | 30 | 11.1 | 71 | -1.3 | | |
Memphis | American Athletic | 6 | 0 | 28 | 11.4 | 4 | 19.4 | | 16 |
Wisconsin | Big Ten | 6 | 2 | 29 | 11.4 | 34 | 7.7 | | |
Michigan State | Big Ten | 8 | 0 | 27 | 11.9 | 3 | 20.3 | | 6 |
Boise State | Mountain West | 5 | 2 | 26 | 12.1 | 42 | 4.5 | | |
Houston | American Athletic | 6 | 0 | 25 | 13.5 | 16 | 13.7 | | 18 |
Texas A&M | SEC | 5 | 2 | 24 | 13.7 | 28 | 9.2 | | |
North Carolina | ACC | 4 | 1 | 23 | 13.8 | 38 | 5.2 | | |
Iowa | Big Ten | 6 | 0 | 22 | 14.0 | 1 | 21.4 | | 10 |
UCLA | Pac 12 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 14.1 | 29 | 9.0 | | 24 |
Georgia | SEC | 4 | 2 | 20 | 14.8 | 44 | 4.0 | | |
Florida State | ACC | 6 | 1 | 19 | 15.6 | 32 | 7.9 | | 17 |
West Virginia | Big 12 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 15.8 | 49 | 2.5 | | |
Mississippi | SEC | 5 | 2 | 17 | 16.1 | 19 | 13.0 | | 19 |
Utah | Pac 12 | 6 | 1 | 16 | 16.2 | 13 | 14.3 | | 13 |
Mississippi State | SEC | 5 | 2 | 15 | 16.4 | 27 | 9.7 | | 25 |
Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 16.7 | 9 | 17.2 | | 12 |
Tennessee | SEC | 2 | 4 | 13 | 17.3 | 57 | 0.9 | | |
Florida | SEC | 6 | 1 | 11 | 17.4 | 10 | 15.8 | | 11 |
Michigan | Big Ten | 5 | 2 | 12 | 17.4 | 24 | 10.6 | | 15 |
LSU | SEC | 7 | 0 | 10 | 18.3 | 2 | 20.8 | | 4 |
Texas Christian | Big 12 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 18.3 | 7 | 18.3 | | 5 |
Stanford | Pac 12 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 19.2 | 17 | 13.6 | | 8 |
Notre Dame | Independent | 6 | 1 | 7 | 19.7 | 14 | 14.2 | | 9 |
USC | Pac 12 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 21.0 | 37 | 5.3 | | |
Ohio State | Big Ten | 8 | 0 | 5 | 21.1 | 6 | 18.5 | | 1 |
Alabama | SEC | 7 | 1 | 4 | 23.2 | 11 | 14.9 | | 7 |
Oklahoma | Big 12 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 24.5 | 23 | 11.4 | | 14 |
Clemson | ACC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 25.7 | 5 | 19.1 | | 3 |
Baylor | Big 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 27.9 | 12 | 14.9 | | 2 |
College sports ratings use a somewhat less sophisticated version of the NFL model that does not use individual play data. Final scores and game location are the only data used. Unlike BCS computer ratings, point difference is factored rather than simply the outcome of the game. Instead of adjusting ratings for repeatability, both teams in each game are given equal responsibility for the result. Each team is assigned a normal probability distribution for quality such that the most likely scenario considering all games at once is optimized. In doing so, home field advantage is factored where applicable and strength of schedule is automatically accounted for. After 1 game, a team's rating will simply be their net points divided by 2. Past the first game, relative strength of opponents and how far a result is from the expected result begin to factor in. Like the NFL ratings, the first few weeks' ratings are unreliable but quickly become increasingly accurate thereafter. Subtracting one team's rating from another's will give an expected point spread should they play at a neutral site.