2015 College Football Ratings Summary |
College |
Conference |
W |
L |
P-Rank |
P-Rating |
R-Rank |
R-Rating |
CFP Rank |
AP Rank |
North Carolina-Charlotte | Conference USA | 1 | 4 | 128 | -29.8 | 113 | -12.1 | | |
New Mexico State | Sun Belt | 0 | 6 | 127 | -26.3 | 128 | -20.6 | | |
Texas-El Paso | Conference USA | 1 | 4 | 126 | -26.2 | 120 | -14.9 | | |
Miami (Ohio) | Mid-American | 0 | 6 | 125 | -25.2 | 124 | -16.7 | | |
North Texas | Conference USA | 0 | 5 | 124 | -24.7 | 122 | -15.8 | | |
Eastern Michigan | Mid-American | 1 | 6 | 123 | -23.7 | 125 | -17.7 | | |
Old Dominion | Conference USA | 2 | 3 | 122 | -23.3 | 90 | -6.4 | | |
Idaho | Sun Belt | 1 | 4 | 121 | -22.5 | 103 | -10.3 | | |
Georgia State | Sun Belt | 2 | 3 | 120 | -22.1 | 99 | -7.9 | | |
Tulane | American Athletic | 1 | 4 | 119 | -21.0 | 104 | -10.6 | | |
Texas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 4 | 118 | -19.7 | 119 | -14.9 | | |
South Alabama | Sun Belt | 2 | 3 | 117 | -19.3 | 89 | -5.9 | | |
Fresno State | Mountain West | 1 | 5 | 116 | -19.1 | 107 | -10.7 | | |
Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 0 | 5 | 115 | -19.0 | 114 | -12.4 | | |
Troy | Sun Belt | 0 | 5 | 114 | -18.8 | 126 | -18.4 | | |
Wyoming | Mountain West | 1 | 5 | 113 | -17.8 | 123 | -16.0 | | |
Kent State | Mid-American | 2 | 4 | 112 | -17.2 | 85 | -5.1 | | |
New Mexico | Mountain West | 3 | 3 | 111 | -16.8 | 93 | -7.3 | | |
Florida Atlantic | Conference USA | 1 | 5 | 110 | -16.1 | 117 | -13.9 | | |
Hawaii | Mountain West | 1 | 5 | 109 | -16.1 | 102 | -10.2 | | |
Massachusetts | Mid-American | 1 | 5 | 108 | -16.0 | 110 | -11.6 | | |
Texas-San Antonio | Conference USA | 1 | 6 | 107 | -15.4 | 118 | -13.9 | | |
Kansas | Big 12 | 0 | 5 | 106 | -14.2 | 116 | -12.8 | | |
Ball State | Mid-American | 1 | 5 | 105 | -13.3 | 109 | -11.4 | | |
Rice | Conference USA | 2 | 3 | 104 | -13.3 | 74 | -2.5 | | |
Nevada-Las Vegas | Mountain West | 1 | 5 | 103 | -13.1 | 115 | -12.6 | | |
Buffalo | Mid-American | 1 | 4 | 102 | -12.7 | 112 | -11.9 | | |
San Jose State | Mountain West | 2 | 4 | 101 | -12.5 | 100 | -8.2 | | |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Sun Belt | 1 | 3 | 100 | -12.4 | 105 | -10.7 | | |
Central Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 6 | 99 | -12.0 | 127 | -20.3 | | |
Akron | Mid-American | 2 | 4 | 98 | -11.7 | 84 | -4.7 | | |
Army | Independent | 1 | 4 | 97 | -11.6 | 111 | -11.8 | | |
Southern Methodist | American Athletic | 1 | 4 | 96 | -11.4 | 92 | -6.9 | | |
Nevada | Mountain West | 2 | 4 | 95 | -10.8 | 108 | -10.8 | | |
Arkansas State | Sun Belt | 2 | 3 | 94 | -10.4 | 75 | -2.9 | | |
Ohio U. | Mid-American | 4 | 2 | 93 | -8.5 | 51 | 3.1 | | |
Purdue | Big Ten | 0 | 6 | 92 | -8.4 | 121 | -15.6 | | |
Florida International | Conference USA | 2 | 4 | 91 | -8.2 | 106 | -10.7 | | |
Air Force | Mountain West | 2 | 3 | 90 | -7.2 | 83 | -4.6 | | |
Colorado State | Mountain West | 2 | 4 | 89 | -6.6 | 98 | -7.7 | | |
San Diego State | Mountain West | 3 | 3 | 88 | -6.5 | 71 | -1.6 | | |
Oregon State | Pac 12 | 1 | 4 | 87 | -6.5 | 86 | -5.2 | | |
Tulsa | American Athletic | 3 | 3 | 86 | -6.2 | 65 | -0.5 | | |
Southern Mississippi | Conference USA | 3 | 3 | 85 | -5.7 | 79 | -3.8 | | |
Colorado | Pac 12 | 2 | 4 | 84 | -5.4 | 101 | -8.2 | | |
Wake Forest | ACC | 2 | 4 | 83 | -4.8 | 82 | -4.6 | | |
Connecticut | American Athletic | 2 | 4 | 82 | -4.7 | 97 | -7.7 | | |
Maryland | Big Ten | 1 | 4 | 81 | -4.5 | 88 | -5.4 | | |
Iowa State | Big 12 | 1 | 4 | 80 | -4.0 | 80 | -4.5 | | |
Western Michigan | Mid-American | 2 | 3 | 79 | -2.5 | 44 | 3.8 | | |
Syracuse | ACC | 2 | 3 | 78 | -2.4 | 77 | -3.3 | | |
Minnesota | Big Ten | 4 | 3 | 77 | -2.4 | 56 | 1.8 | | |
Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 4 | 1 | 76 | -2.3 | 37 | 5.6 | | |
Middle Tennessee State | Conference USA | 2 | 4 | 75 | -1.9 | 94 | -7.3 | | |
Rutgers | Big Ten | 2 | 3 | 74 | -1.3 | 61 | 1.4 | | |
South Florida | American Athletic | 2 | 3 | 73 | -0.9 | 67 | -0.9 | | |
Virginia | ACC | 1 | 4 | 72 | -0.6 | 87 | -5.3 | | |
Marshall | Conference USA | 5 | 1 | 71 | -0.3 | 35 | 6.2 | | |
Central Michigan | Mid-American | 2 | 4 | 70 | -0.3 | 78 | -3.8 | | |
Northern Illinois | Mid-American | 3 | 3 | 69 | -0.1 | 81 | -4.6 | | |
Cincinnati | American Athletic | 2 | 3 | 68 | -0.1 | 60 | 1.4 | | |
Indiana | Big Ten | 3 | 3 | 67 | 0.4 | 57 | 1.7 | | |
Louisiana Tech | Conference USA | 3 | 3 | 66 | 0.8 | 70 | -1.6 | | |
Vanderbilt | SEC | 1 | 4 | 65 | 1.2 | 91 | -6.7 | | |
Boston College | ACC | 1 | 4 | 64 | 1.5 | 95 | -7.4 | | |
Northwestern | Big Ten | 4 | 2 | 63 | 2.6 | 23 | 10.4 | | |
Bowling Green State | Mid-American | 5 | 2 | 62 | 2.7 | 49 | 3.5 | | |
Illinois | Big Ten | 3 | 2 | 61 | 3.3 | 46 | 3.8 | | |
South Carolina | SEC | 3 | 4 | 60 | 3.5 | 69 | -1.5 | | |
Penn State | Big Ten | 5 | 2 | 59 | 3.5 | 31 | 8.1 | | |
East Carolina | American Athletic | 3 | 3 | 58 | 3.7 | 48 | 3.7 | | |
Arizona | Pac 12 | 4 | 2 | 57 | 3.8 | 53 | 2.8 | | |
Temple | American Athletic | 6 | 0 | 56 | 3.9 | 13 | 14.7 | | 22 |
Texas | Big 12 | 2 | 4 | 55 | 4.0 | 47 | 3.7 | | |
Kansas State | Big 12 | 2 | 3 | 54 | 4.0 | 63 | 0.3 | | |
Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 4 | 1 | 53 | 4.7 | 29 | 8.3 | | |
Kentucky | SEC | 3 | 2 | 52 | 5.0 | 50 | 3.4 | | |
Navy | American Athletic | 3 | 1 | 51 | 5.6 | 30 | 8.1 | | |
Missouri | SEC | 3 | 3 | 50 | 5.8 | 58 | 1.6 | | |
Washington State | Pac 12 | 4 | 1 | 49 | 6.1 | 19 | 11.9 | | |
Toledo | Mid-American | 6 | 0 | 48 | 6.5 | 18 | 12.7 | | 19 |
North Carolina State | ACC | 3 | 2 | 47 | 6.6 | 68 | -1.5 | | |
Western Kentucky | Conference USA | 6 | 1 | 46 | 7.6 | 32 | 7.8 | | |
Louisville | ACC | 1 | 4 | 45 | 7.8 | 72 | -1.8 | | |
Virginia Tech | ACC | 2 | 4 | 44 | 8.0 | 76 | -3.0 | | |
Brigham Young | Independent | 5 | 2 | 43 | 8.2 | 27 | 9.0 | | |
Arizona State | Pac 12 | 3 | 3 | 42 | 8.4 | 55 | 2.2 | | |
Oregon | Pac 12 | 3 | 3 | 41 | 8.7 | 39 | 4.8 | | |
Duke | ACC | 4 | 1 | 40 | 8.9 | 40 | 4.8 | | 23 |
Georgia Tech | ACC | 1 | 5 | 39 | 9.0 | 96 | -7.5 | | |
Auburn | SEC | 3 | 2 | 38 | 9.1 | 33 | 6.2 | | |
Pittsburgh | ACC | 4 | 1 | 37 | 9.2 | 22 | 11.2 | | 25 |
Utah State | Mountain West | 3 | 2 | 36 | 9.4 | 42 | 4.5 | | |
Memphis | American Athletic | 5 | 0 | 35 | 9.5 | 6 | 17.4 | | 18 |
Arkansas | SEC | 2 | 4 | 34 | 9.6 | 73 | -1.9 | | |
Miami (Fla.) | ACC | 3 | 2 | 33 | 9.6 | 52 | 3.0 | | |
Nebraska | Big Ten | 3 | 4 | 32 | 9.6 | 66 | -0.9 | | |
Houston | American Athletic | 5 | 0 | 31 | 9.6 | 15 | 13.6 | | 21 |
Wisconsin | Big Ten | 5 | 2 | 30 | 10.5 | 41 | 4.7 | | |
Michigan State | Big Ten | 7 | 0 | 29 | 11.2 | 3 | 20.1 | | 7 |
Texas Tech | Big 12 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 11.2 | 36 | 5.7 | | |
California | Pac 12 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 12.2 | 11 | 15.3 | | 20 |
Washington | Pac 12 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 12.6 | 59 | 1.5 | | |
UCLA | Pac 12 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 12.8 | 34 | 6.2 | | |
Iowa | Big Ten | 6 | 0 | 24 | 13.6 | 1 | 20.5 | | 12 |
Mississippi State | SEC | 4 | 2 | 23 | 14.1 | 28 | 8.5 | | |
Boise State | Mountain West | 4 | 2 | 22 | 14.6 | 38 | 5.3 | | |
North Carolina | ACC | 3 | 1 | 21 | 14.7 | 43 | 4.1 | | |
Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 14.8 | 9 | 16.7 | | 14 |
Mississippi | SEC | 4 | 2 | 19 | 14.9 | 26 | 9.9 | | 24 |
Texas A&M | SEC | 5 | 1 | 18 | 15.0 | 25 | 10.0 | | 15 |
Georgia | SEC | 4 | 2 | 17 | 15.2 | 45 | 3.8 | | |
West Virginia | Big 12 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 15.5 | 54 | 2.7 | | |
Tennessee | SEC | 2 | 3 | 15 | 16.0 | 64 | 0.2 | | |
LSU | SEC | 6 | 0 | 14 | 16.4 | 4 | 20.0 | | 5 |
Florida State | ACC | 6 | 0 | 13 | 16.6 | 14 | 14.2 | | 9 |
Michigan | Big Ten | 5 | 2 | 12 | 17.3 | 21 | 11.2 | | 15 |
Florida | SEC | 6 | 1 | 11 | 17.9 | 10 | 16.0 | | 13 |
Texas Christian | Big 12 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 18.5 | 5 | 18.7 | | 4 |
Utah | Pac 12 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 18.5 | 2 | 20.3 | | 3 |
Stanford | Pac 12 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 18.5 | 20 | 11.8 | | 10 |
Notre Dame | Independent | 6 | 1 | 7 | 18.5 | 17 | 12.8 | | 11 |
Ohio State | Big Ten | 7 | 0 | 6 | 18.9 | 7 | 17.2 | | 1 |
Clemson | ACC | 5 | 0 | 5 | 19.3 | 8 | 16.8 | | 6 |
USC | Pac 12 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 19.5 | 62 | 1.1 | | |
Oklahoma | Big 12 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 22.2 | 24 | 10.1 | | 17 |
Alabama | SEC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 24.1 | 16 | 13.2 | | 8 |
Baylor | Big 12 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 30.9 | 12 | 14.8 | | 2 |
College sports ratings use a somewhat less sophisticated version of the NFL model that does not use individual play data. Final scores and game location are the only data used. Unlike BCS computer ratings, point difference is factored rather than simply the outcome of the game. Instead of adjusting ratings for repeatability, both teams in each game are given equal responsibility for the result. Each team is assigned a normal probability distribution for quality such that the most likely scenario considering all games at once is optimized. In doing so, home field advantage is factored where applicable and strength of schedule is automatically accounted for. After 1 game, a team's rating will simply be their net points divided by 2. Past the first game, relative strength of opponents and how far a result is from the expected result begin to factor in. Like the NFL ratings, the first few weeks' ratings are unreliable but quickly become increasingly accurate thereafter. Subtracting one team's rating from another's will give an expected point spread should they play at a neutral site.