2015 College Football Ratings Summary |
College |
Conference |
W |
L |
P-Rank |
P-Rating |
R-Rank |
R-Rating |
CFP Rank |
AP Rank |
Brigham Young | Independent | 2 | 0 | 34 | 8.7 | 1 | 11.1 | | 19 |
Kentucky | SEC | 2 | 0 | 47 | 6.4 | 2 | 10.4 | | |
Oklahoma | Big 12 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 19.4 | 3 | 10.3 | | 16 |
Ohio State | Big Ten | 2 | 0 | 1 | 25.7 | 4 | 10.2 | | 1 |
Temple | American Athletic | 2 | 0 | 54 | 4.2 | 5 | 9.8 | | |
Alabama | SEC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 24.7 | 6 | 9.3 | | 2 |
Notre Dame | Independent | 2 | 0 | 6 | 19.7 | 7 | 9.3 | | 8 |
Ohio U. | Mid-American | 2 | 0 | 78 | -5.0 | 8 | 9.2 | | |
Utah | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 37 | 8.7 | 13 | 8.5 | | 21 |
Texas A&M | SEC | 2 | 0 | 8 | 19.4 | 15 | 8.1 | | 17 |
Georgia | SEC | 2 | 0 | 5 | 20.3 | 16 | 7.9 | | 7 |
Western Kentucky | Conference USA | 2 | 0 | 71 | -1.7 | 17 | 7.9 | | |
Arizona | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 8.9 | 18 | 7.9 | | 20 |
Tulsa | American Athletic | 2 | 0 | 88 | -7.5 | 18 | 7.9 | | |
Michigan State | Big Ten | 2 | 0 | 21 | 14.4 | 21 | 7.8 | | 4 |
Florida State | ACC | 2 | 0 | 10 | 19.2 | 22 | 7.4 | | 9 |
UCLA | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 19.0 | 23 | 7.3 | | 10 |
Florida | SEC | 2 | 0 | 25 | 13.3 | 29 | 6.1 | | |
USC | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 24.1 | 34 | 5.6 | | 6 |
Old Dominion | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 109 | -14.1 | 9 | 8.7 | | |
Texas Christian | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 17.4 | 9 | 8.7 | | 3 |
LSU | SEC | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17.7 | 11 | 8.7 | | 13 |
North Carolina-Charlotte | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 125 | -22.8 | 12 | 8.5 | | |
Baylor | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18.9 | 14 | 8.1 | | 5 |
Toledo | Mid-American | 1 | 0 | 59 | 2.1 | 20 | 7.9 | | |
Iowa | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 46 | 6.5 | 24 | 6.3 | | |
Memphis | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 40 | 8.0 | 24 | 6.3 | | |
Washington State | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 57 | 3.4 | 24 | 6.3 | | |
Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 7.0 | 27 | 6.3 | | 25 |
Indiana | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 60 | 1.4 | 28 | 6.3 | | |
Pittsburgh | ACC | 1 | 0 | 53 | 4.5 | 30 | 5.9 | | |
West Virginia | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 17.2 | 31 | 5.8 | | |
Kansas State | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 13.4 | 32 | 5.8 | | |
Miami (Fla.) | ACC | 1 | 0 | 22 | 13.9 | 32 | 5.8 | | |
Missouri | SEC | 1 | 0 | 35 | 8.7 | 35 | 5.6 | | 22 |
Northwestern | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 48 | 6.2 | 36 | 5.6 | | 23 |
Duke | ACC | 1 | 0 | 41 | 7.1 | 37 | 5.5 | | |
Houston | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 56 | 3.6 | 38 | 5.3 | | |
Air Force | Mountain West | 1 | 0 | 82 | -5.4 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
California | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 9.8 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
Clemson | ACC | 1 | 0 | 18 | 15.8 | 39 | 4.5 | | 11 |
Connecticut | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 105 | -13.0 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
Mississippi | SEC | 1 | 0 | 4 | 23.2 | 39 | 4.5 | | 15 |
Syracuse | ACC | 1 | 0 | 64 | 0.6 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
Illinois | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 43 | 6.9 | 45 | 4.5 | | |
North Carolina State | ACC | 1 | 0 | 51 | 5.2 | 45 | 4.5 | | |
Auburn | SEC | 1 | 0 | 13 | 17.8 | 47 | 4.1 | | 18 |
Northern Illinois | Mid-American | 1 | 0 | 92 | -8.5 | 48 | 3.5 | | |
Georgia Tech | ACC | 1 | 0 | 17 | 16.3 | 49 | 3.3 | | 14 |
Texas Tech | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 9.8 | 50 | 3.3 | | |
Hawaii | Mountain West | 1 | 1 | 89 | -7.6 | 51 | 2.4 | | |
Tennessee | SEC | 1 | 1 | 19 | 15.2 | 52 | 1.6 | | |
Boise State | Mountain West | 1 | 1 | 50 | 5.2 | 53 | 1.3 | | |
Penn State | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 65 | 0.5 | 54 | 1.0 | | |
Texas | Big 12 | 1 | 1 | 55 | 3.7 | 55 | 0.9 | | |
Marshall | Conference USA | 1 | 1 | 62 | 0.9 | 56 | 0.9 | | |
Michigan | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 27 | 10.8 | 57 | 0.7 | | |
Florida International | Conference USA | 1 | 1 | 91 | -8.3 | 58 | 0.6 | | |
Mississippi State | SEC | 1 | 1 | 23 | 13.7 | 59 | 0.0 | | |
Eastern Michigan | Mid-American | 1 | 1 | 115 | -16.8 | 62 | 0.0 | | |
Minnesota | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 49 | 5.3 | 62 | 0.0 | | |
Wisconsin | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 20 | 15.0 | 64 | -0.1 | | 24 |
South Carolina | SEC | 1 | 1 | 39 | 8.1 | 65 | -0.1 | | |
Georgia State | Sun Belt | 1 | 1 | 127 | -23.7 | 66 | -0.4 | | |
Nebraska | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 26 | 11.4 | 67 | -0.6 | | |
Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 1 | 1 | 90 | -7.9 | 68 | -0.8 | | |
Colorado | Pac 12 | 1 | 1 | 68 | -1.3 | 69 | -1.1 | | |
Bowling Green State | Mid-American | 1 | 1 | 77 | -4.3 | 70 | -1.2 | | |
Stanford | Pac 12 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 10.7 | 71 | -1.3 | | |
Southern Methodist | American Athletic | 1 | 1 | 108 | -13.8 | 72 | -1.5 | | |
Arkansas | SEC | 1 | 1 | 36 | 8.7 | 73 | -2.2 | | |
Boston College | ACC | 0 | 0 | 58 | 3.3 | 60 | 0.0 | | |
Navy | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 85 | -6.7 | 60 | 0.0 | | |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 76 | -4.1 | 74 | -2.9 | | |
Middle Tennessee State | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 80 | -5.3 | 75 | -3.2 | | |
Utah State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 75 | -4.1 | 76 | -3.4 | | |
Ball State | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 97 | -10.5 | 77 | -3.5 | | |
Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 107 | -13.3 | 78 | -3.6 | | |
Louisiana Tech | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 66 | 0.2 | 79 | -3.6 | | |
Oregon | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 19.3 | 80 | -3.6 | | 12 |
Texas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 104 | -12.9 | 81 | -3.7 | | |
South Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 70 | -1.7 | 82 | -3.7 | | |
East Carolina | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 63 | 0.8 | 83 | -4.1 | | |
Kent State | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 126 | -23.1 | 84 | -4.5 | | |
Troy | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 116 | -18.0 | 84 | -4.5 | | |
Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 103 | -12.7 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Army | Independent | 0 | 1 | 110 | -15.0 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Fresno State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 102 | -12.7 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
San Diego State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 87 | -7.5 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
San Jose State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 111 | -15.3 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Wake Forest | ACC | 0 | 1 | 79 | -5.1 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Arizona State | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 8.9 | 92 | -4.6 | | |
Virginia Tech | ACC | 0 | 1 | 38 | 8.4 | 93 | -5.0 | | |
Cincinnati | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 67 | -1.1 | 94 | -5.1 | | |
Washington | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 9.8 | 95 | -5.6 | | |
Buffalo | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 106 | -13.1 | 96 | -5.7 | | |
Rice | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 86 | -7.4 | 97 | -5.8 | | |
Purdue | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 74 | -3.7 | 98 | -5.8 | | |
Nevada | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 96 | -10.2 | 99 | -5.8 | | |
New Mexico | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 117 | -18.2 | 99 | -5.8 | | |
Oregon State | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 72 | -2.3 | 101 | -5.8 | | |
Miami (Ohio) | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 124 | -22.2 | 102 | -6.1 | | |
South Alabama | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 114 | -16.7 | 103 | -6.3 | | |
Central Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 94 | -9.1 | 104 | -6.3 | | |
Iowa State | Big 12 | 0 | 1 | 81 | -5.3 | 105 | -6.3 | | |
Kansas | Big 12 | 0 | 1 | 98 | -10.5 | 105 | -6.3 | | |
Rutgers | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 61 | 1.0 | 105 | -6.3 | | |
Massachusetts | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 122 | -21.2 | 108 | -6.5 | | |
North Texas | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 118 | -18.8 | 109 | -6.6 | | |
Virginia | ACC | 0 | 2 | 45 | 6.7 | 110 | -7.0 | | |
Idaho | Sun Belt | 0 | 2 | 123 | -21.6 | 111 | -7.3 | | |
North Carolina | ACC | 0 | 1 | 52 | 4.5 | 112 | -7.4 | | |
Akron | Mid-American | 0 | 2 | 112 | -15.4 | 113 | -7.5 | | |
Florida Atlantic | Conference USA | 0 | 2 | 95 | -9.7 | 114 | -7.9 | | |
Texas-San Antonio | Conference USA | 0 | 2 | 100 | -10.7 | 114 | -7.9 | | |
Nevada-Las Vegas | Mountain West | 0 | 2 | 113 | -16.2 | 116 | -8.3 | | |
Arkansas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 2 | 93 | -8.9 | 117 | -8.3 | | |
Vanderbilt | SEC | 0 | 2 | 69 | -1.6 | 118 | -8.7 | | |
Colorado State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 73 | -3.3 | 119 | -8.7 | | |
Wyoming | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 120 | -20.9 | 119 | -8.7 | | |
Southern Mississippi | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 99 | -10.6 | 121 | -8.7 | | |
Tulane | American Athletic | 0 | 2 | 119 | -19.9 | 122 | -8.8 | | |
Texas-El Paso | Conference USA | 0 | 2 | 121 | -21.1 | 123 | -8.9 | | |
Western Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 2 | 101 | -10.8 | 124 | -9.1 | | |
Maryland | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 84 | -6.3 | 125 | -9.2 | | |
Louisville | ACC | 0 | 2 | 44 | 6.9 | 126 | -9.4 | | |
New Mexico State | Sun Belt | 0 | 2 | 128 | -25.6 | 127 | -10.1 | | |
Central Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 2 | 83 | -5.5 | 128 | -11.1 | | |
College sports ratings use a somewhat less sophisticated version of the NFL model that does not use individual play data. Final scores and game location are the only data used. Unlike BCS computer ratings, point difference is factored rather than simply the outcome of the game. Instead of adjusting ratings for repeatability, both teams in each game are given equal responsibility for the result. Each team is assigned a normal probability distribution for quality such that the most likely scenario considering all games at once is optimized. In doing so, home field advantage is factored where applicable and strength of schedule is automatically accounted for. After 1 game, a team's rating will simply be their net points divided by 2. Past the first game, relative strength of opponents and how far a result is from the expected result begin to factor in. Like the NFL ratings, the first few weeks' ratings are unreliable but quickly become increasingly accurate thereafter. Subtracting one team's rating from another's will give an expected point spread should they play at a neutral site.