2015 College Football Ratings Summary |
College |
Conference |
W |
L |
P-Rank |
P-Rating |
R-Rank |
R-Rating |
CFP Rank |
AP Rank |
North Carolina-Charlotte | Conference USA | 1 | 3 | 128 | -30.9 | 111 | -10.1 | | |
North Texas | Conference USA | 0 | 4 | 127 | -26.0 | 125 | -16.1 | | |
New Mexico State | Sun Belt | 0 | 4 | 126 | -25.0 | 128 | -19.7 | | |
Georgia State | Sun Belt | 1 | 2 | 125 | -24.8 | 112 | -10.1 | | |
Idaho | Sun Belt | 0 | 4 | 124 | -23.4 | 119 | -13.2 | | |
Texas-El Paso | Conference USA | 1 | 3 | 123 | -23.3 | 116 | -11.6 | | |
Old Dominion | Conference USA | 1 | 3 | 122 | -22.5 | 100 | -8.0 | | |
Miami (Ohio) | Mid-American | 0 | 4 | 121 | -21.7 | 121 | -13.7 | | |
Wyoming | Mountain West | 0 | 4 | 120 | -20.5 | 127 | -19.1 | | |
Eastern Michigan | Mid-American | 1 | 4 | 119 | -18.7 | 124 | -15.0 | | |
Kent State | Mid-American | 1 | 3 | 118 | -18.2 | 96 | -7.5 | | |
South Alabama | Sun Belt | 2 | 2 | 117 | -17.7 | 72 | -2.6 | | |
Troy | Sun Belt | 0 | 3 | 116 | -17.5 | 118 | -12.8 | | |
Texas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 3 | 115 | -17.5 | 115 | -11.1 | | |
Fresno State | Mountain West | 0 | 4 | 114 | -17.2 | 122 | -14.0 | | |
Tulane | American Athletic | 1 | 2 | 113 | -16.7 | 103 | -8.4 | | |
Rice | Conference USA | 1 | 3 | 112 | -15.6 | 93 | -6.7 | | |
Florida Atlantic | Conference USA | 1 | 3 | 111 | -15.2 | 110 | -9.7 | | |
New Mexico | Mountain West | 2 | 2 | 110 | -15.1 | 86 | -5.4 | | |
Texas-San Antonio | Conference USA | 1 | 4 | 109 | -15.0 | 109 | -9.7 | | |
Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 0 | 3 | 108 | -14.7 | 108 | -9.6 | | |
Hawaii | Mountain West | 1 | 3 | 107 | -14.6 | 76 | -3.4 | | |
Massachusetts | Mid-American | 1 | 3 | 106 | -14.6 | 89 | -5.5 | | |
Kansas | Big 12 | 0 | 3 | 105 | -13.9 | 117 | -11.8 | | |
Southern Methodist | American Athletic | 1 | 3 | 104 | -13.5 | 94 | -7.0 | | |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Sun Belt | 0 | 3 | 103 | -13.3 | 120 | -13.3 | | |
Arkansas State | Sun Belt | 1 | 3 | 102 | -12.2 | 90 | -5.7 | | |
San Diego State | Mountain West | 1 | 3 | 101 | -11.3 | 101 | -8.2 | | |
Nevada-Las Vegas | Mountain West | 1 | 3 | 100 | -10.8 | 87 | -5.5 | | |
Buffalo | Mid-American | 1 | 3 | 99 | -10.0 | 106 | -9.4 | | |
Western Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 3 | 98 | -9.9 | 95 | -7.3 | | |
Nevada | Mountain West | 1 | 3 | 97 | -9.8 | 102 | -8.2 | | |
Florida International | Conference USA | 1 | 3 | 96 | -9.4 | 97 | -7.6 | | |
Akron | Mid-American | 1 | 3 | 95 | -9.4 | 84 | -5.2 | | |
San Jose State | Mountain West | 1 | 3 | 94 | -8.8 | 105 | -8.7 | | |
Central Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 4 | 93 | -8.4 | 126 | -16.3 | | |
Colorado State | Mountain West | 1 | 3 | 92 | -7.5 | 99 | -7.8 | | |
Army | Independent | 1 | 3 | 91 | -7.1 | 107 | -9.4 | | |
Maryland | Big Ten | 1 | 3 | 90 | -6.9 | 98 | -7.7 | | |
Purdue | Big Ten | 0 | 4 | 89 | -6.9 | 123 | -14.8 | | |
South Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 3 | 88 | -6.8 | 114 | -10.6 | | |
Ball State | Mid-American | 1 | 3 | 87 | -6.8 | 68 | -1.9 | | |
Connecticut | American Athletic | 1 | 3 | 86 | -6.6 | 83 | -4.7 | | |
Ohio U. | Mid-American | 3 | 1 | 85 | -5.2 | 31 | 7.0 | | |
Tulsa | American Athletic | 2 | 2 | 84 | -5.1 | 57 | 2.1 | | |
Southern Mississippi | Conference USA | 2 | 2 | 83 | -5.1 | 79 | -3.8 | | |
Air Force | Mountain West | 1 | 2 | 82 | -4.9 | 62 | -0.8 | | |
Rutgers | Big Ten | 1 | 2 | 81 | -4.4 | 88 | -5.5 | | |
Central Michigan | Mid-American | 1 | 3 | 80 | -4.3 | 78 | -3.5 | | |
Colorado | Pac 12 | 2 | 2 | 79 | -3.7 | 74 | -3.2 | | |
Wake Forest | ACC | 1 | 3 | 78 | -3.1 | 81 | -4.4 | | |
Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 3 | 1 | 77 | -3.0 | 43 | 4.4 | | |
Minnesota | Big Ten | 3 | 2 | 76 | -2.8 | 34 | 6.5 | | |
Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 2 | 1 | 75 | -2.8 | 49 | 3.7 | | |
Northern Illinois | Mid-American | 1 | 3 | 74 | -2.5 | 92 | -6.2 | | |
Bowling Green State | Mid-American | 3 | 2 | 73 | -2.5 | 60 | 0.4 | | |
Marshall | Conference USA | 3 | 1 | 72 | -2.1 | 47 | 4.0 | | |
Virginia | ACC | 0 | 3 | 71 | -1.7 | 113 | -10.2 | | |
Texas | Big 12 | 1 | 4 | 70 | -1.1 | 80 | -4.1 | | |
Iowa State | Big 12 | 1 | 2 | 69 | -0.4 | 69 | -2.1 | | |
Cincinnati | American Athletic | 2 | 2 | 68 | -0.3 | 51 | 3.2 | | |
Oregon State | Pac 12 | 1 | 2 | 67 | -0.3 | 70 | -2.4 | | |
Utah State | Mountain West | 1 | 2 | 66 | -0.1 | 75 | -3.3 | | |
Syracuse | ACC | 2 | 1 | 65 | 0.4 | 48 | 3.9 | | |
Arizona | Pac 12 | 2 | 2 | 64 | 0.5 | 61 | 0.2 | | |
Washington State | Pac 12 | 2 | 1 | 63 | 0.9 | 44 | 4.3 | | |
Middle Tennessee State | Conference USA | 1 | 3 | 62 | 1.2 | 104 | -8.5 | | |
Boston College | ACC | 1 | 2 | 61 | 2.2 | 73 | -2.6 | | |
Illinois | Big Ten | 3 | 1 | 60 | 2.3 | 50 | 3.3 | | |
Penn State | Big Ten | 4 | 1 | 59 | 2.4 | 39 | 6.0 | | |
Temple | American Athletic | 4 | 0 | 58 | 2.9 | 6 | 15.3 | | |
East Carolina | American Athletic | 2 | 2 | 57 | 3.0 | 46 | 4.0 | | |
Vanderbilt | SEC | 1 | 3 | 56 | 3.1 | 82 | -4.7 | | |
Indiana | Big Ten | 3 | 1 | 55 | 3.9 | 26 | 8.2 | | |
South Carolina | SEC | 2 | 3 | 54 | 4.3 | 63 | -1.2 | | |
Louisiana Tech | Conference USA | 2 | 2 | 53 | 4.5 | 64 | -1.2 | | |
Kentucky | SEC | 3 | 1 | 52 | 5.2 | 24 | 8.7 | | |
Missouri | SEC | 3 | 1 | 51 | 5.3 | 33 | 6.7 | | |
Memphis | American Athletic | 4 | 0 | 50 | 5.3 | 14 | 13.5 | | |
Navy | American Athletic | 3 | 0 | 49 | 5.7 | 19 | 12.2 | | |
Toledo | Mid-American | 4 | 0 | 48 | 5.7 | 15 | 13.5 | | 24 |
Western Kentucky | Conference USA | 4 | 1 | 47 | 6.9 | 27 | 7.8 | | |
Virginia Tech | ACC | 1 | 3 | 46 | 7.0 | 85 | -5.3 | | |
Duke | ACC | 3 | 1 | 45 | 7.4 | 36 | 6.3 | | |
Miami (Fla.) | ACC | 2 | 1 | 44 | 7.4 | 52 | 3.0 | | |
Oregon | Pac 12 | 2 | 2 | 43 | 7.8 | 54 | 2.8 | | |
Brigham Young | Independent | 3 | 2 | 42 | 8.1 | 38 | 6.0 | | |
Nebraska | Big Ten | 2 | 3 | 41 | 8.1 | 71 | -2.5 | | |
Michigan State | Big Ten | 5 | 0 | 40 | 8.3 | 18 | 12.6 | | 4 |
California | Pac 12 | 4 | 0 | 39 | 8.7 | 12 | 13.8 | | 23 |
Pittsburgh | ACC | 2 | 1 | 38 | 9.0 | 30 | 7.4 | | |
Arizona State | Pac 12 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 9.1 | 45 | 4.2 | | |
North Carolina State | ACC | 3 | 1 | 36 | 9.1 | 56 | 2.4 | | |
Arkansas | SEC | 2 | 3 | 35 | 9.2 | 67 | -1.7 | | |
Louisville | ACC | 1 | 3 | 34 | 9.3 | 65 | -1.5 | | |
Auburn | SEC | 2 | 2 | 33 | 9.7 | 58 | 1.2 | | |
Houston | American Athletic | 3 | 0 | 32 | 9.7 | 16 | 13.1 | | |
Texas Tech | Big 12 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 9.8 | 55 | 2.4 | | |
Washington | Pac 12 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 10.0 | 66 | -1.6 | | |
Northwestern | Big Ten | 4 | 0 | 29 | 10.3 | 1 | 18.0 | | 13 |
Georgia Tech | ACC | 1 | 3 | 28 | 10.7 | 91 | -6.1 | | |
Iowa | Big Ten | 4 | 0 | 27 | 11.2 | 9 | 15.0 | | 22 |
Wisconsin | Big Ten | 3 | 2 | 26 | 11.3 | 59 | 0.5 | | |
Kansas State | Big 12 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 11.5 | 40 | 5.6 | | |
North Carolina | ACC | 2 | 1 | 24 | 12.4 | 53 | 2.9 | | |
Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 4 | 0 | 23 | 12.8 | 13 | 13.7 | | 21 |
Tennessee | SEC | 1 | 3 | 22 | 14.2 | 77 | -3.4 | | |
UCLA | Pac 12 | 4 | 1 | 21 | 14.3 | 28 | 7.6 | | 20 |
Mississippi State | SEC | 2 | 2 | 20 | 14.8 | 35 | 6.4 | | |
Florida State | ACC | 4 | 0 | 19 | 16.0 | 20 | 11.6 | | 12 |
LSU | SEC | 4 | 0 | 18 | 16.4 | 3 | 16.5 | | 7 |
Boise State | Mountain West | 3 | 1 | 17 | 16.5 | 41 | 5.5 | | 25 |
Notre Dame | Independent | 4 | 1 | 16 | 16.8 | 29 | 7.5 | | 15 |
Texas Christian | Big 12 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 16.8 | 4 | 16.0 | | 2 |
Michigan | Big Ten | 4 | 1 | 14 | 17.1 | 23 | 10.0 | | 18 |
Utah | Pac 12 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 17.3 | 7 | 15.2 | | 5 |
Mississippi | SEC | 3 | 1 | 12 | 17.4 | 22 | 10.8 | | 14 |
Florida | SEC | 5 | 0 | 11 | 17.5 | 2 | 17.8 | | 11 |
Clemson | ACC | 3 | 0 | 10 | 17.6 | 10 | 14.3 | | 6 |
Ohio State | Big Ten | 5 | 0 | 9 | 17.7 | 5 | 15.5 | | 1 |
West Virginia | Big 12 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 17.7 | 37 | 6.1 | | |
Texas A&M | SEC | 5 | 0 | 7 | 18.0 | 8 | 15.2 | | 9 |
Georgia | SEC | 3 | 1 | 6 | 18.5 | 42 | 4.8 | | 19 |
Stanford | Pac 12 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19.3 | 17 | 12.7 | | 16 |
Oklahoma | Big 12 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 20.4 | 11 | 13.9 | | 10 |
USC | Pac 12 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 23.0 | 32 | 6.8 | | 17 |
Alabama | SEC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 25.0 | 25 | 8.7 | | 8 |
Baylor | Big 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 25.5 | 21 | 11.5 | | 3 |
College sports ratings use a somewhat less sophisticated version of the NFL model that does not use individual play data. Final scores and game location are the only data used. Unlike BCS computer ratings, point difference is factored rather than simply the outcome of the game. Instead of adjusting ratings for repeatability, both teams in each game are given equal responsibility for the result. Each team is assigned a normal probability distribution for quality such that the most likely scenario considering all games at once is optimized. In doing so, home field advantage is factored where applicable and strength of schedule is automatically accounted for. After 1 game, a team's rating will simply be their net points divided by 2. Past the first game, relative strength of opponents and how far a result is from the expected result begin to factor in. Like the NFL ratings, the first few weeks' ratings are unreliable but quickly become increasingly accurate thereafter. Subtracting one team's rating from another's will give an expected point spread should they play at a neutral site.